logo Sign In

Spartacus01

User Group
Members
Join date
22-Nov-2022
Last activity
12-May-2024
Posts
221

Post History

Post
#1569794
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

Fan_edit_fan said:
You’re coming across as ultra defensive and also that you weren’t alive then…or aware then. So since you obviously weren’t around for the release of the PT then sit down and chill out. Love the PT all you want.

I’m not ultra-defensive. I just find it annoying that there are people who try to portray the Prequel hate from the early 2000s as something acceptable and understandable, and who even deny the existence of Prequel fans before 2015. The Prequel hate from the early 2000s brought actors like Ahmed Best to almost commit suicide, not to mention the hundreds of death threats that Hayden Christensen received. Trying to defend the Prequel backlash of the time (or even reducing it to simple “criticism”) is intellectually dishonest, in my opinion. Of course, you can criticize the Prequels all you want. Hell, I criticize some aspects of the Prequels too (despite liking them for the most part). But you can’t deny that the level of hate and backlash they received was unnecessary, toxic, and sometimes even borderline insane.

Fan_edit_fan said:
I think it’s cruel you showed the movies in chronological order haha. You ruin the surprises of the OT.

The Vader twist from The Empire Strikes Back is something that almost the entire planet knows at this point, though. Even people who never saw Star Wars in their lives know that Darth Vader is Luke’s father. It is something that has become intrinsically part of pop culture. So I don’t think I’m ruining anything. Virtually every single person who interacted with pop culture know that. From my experience, there are more people who don’t know that Anakin Skywalker is Darth Vader than people who don’t know that Darth Vader is Luke’s father. Also, the chronological order is the order George Lucas told us to watch the movies, and there is a reason for that. Watching the Original Trilogy first gives you a different perception than watching the Prequel Trilogy first. Not to mention, I’m a meticulous person, so I always like to do things chronologically.

Fan_edit_fan said:
And on the other hand I DON’T believe you that they liked the PT more 🤷‍♂️.

I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I didn’t say that my friends liked the Prequels more than the Original Trilogy. I only said that they appreciated the Prequels more than the people who watched the movies in release order tend to do, precisely due to the fact that they watched the Prequels first.

Post
#1569735
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

Vladius said:
but in almost every way they had the same praises and criticisms people have always had about the prequels before the 2010s pseudo-revival

So they thought that the Prequels are the worst thing that ever happened to Star Wars and thought that they should be destroyed and remade? Because that’s what “people” thought before the “pseudo-revival”.

Anyway, every time I introduced a friend to Star Wars, I always made him/her watch the movies in chronological order, and every time it turned out that they actually liked the Prequels. For some reason, when people watch the Prequels first, they tend to like them more than if they watch them after the OT.

Post
#1569725
Topic
Star Wars: The Legend of the Solo Twins - Released!
Time

Okay, I finally finished watching the edits. You might not like what I’m about to say, but I personally think that being honest is always the best option.

I have five main criticisms:

  1. I think that the concepts behind the main story are good, very good in fact. The problem is, the alterations to the original source material are easily noticeable. I know it’s not your fault, and I know that you tried your best to save these movies, but they look too much like fan edits, so to speak. There are a lot of instances where you can tell that things were modified or cut, there are a lot of scenes that shouldn’t be in the place where you put them, etc. Again, I don’t blame you, you really tried to do your best, and I really appreciate it. But I think that, in order to make your vision come true in the best possible and realistic way, we should at least wait 10 more years, allow the technology to advance more, and allow us to create entire new scenes. It’s the only way we can save those movies.
  2. You kept the original motivations that Luke had for going into exile. Yes, he didn’t try to kill Ben in his sleep, but he still went into exile for 20 years and cowardly refused to help his friends because Ben turned to the Dark Side. I don’t think it fits very well with Luke’s character, because Luke is not a hopeless person. In my opinion, it would have been better if you used AI technology to create new dialogue that implies that Luke went into exile because he wanted to find the first Jedi Temple, and wanted to be alone in order to meditate and understand what he did wrong, with the hope of fixing it later. Maybe you could have kept the original dialogue where he talks about the mistakes of the Jedi, but modifying it in order to make Luke say that the Jedi shouldn’t end, but should only be reformed (which is what his Legends counterpart did). Sure, he should feel guilty for Ben’s turn, but it should not be his only reason for going into exile.
  3. During the confrontation between Kylo and Vader, you should have replaced their voices with AI generated voices. They don’t sound nothing like Adam Driver and James Earl Jones.
  4. I personally think that it would have been better to use the classical Star Wars crawled for both movies. Sure, without the episodic title, but still with the crawl. Instead of showing flashbacks from other shows, I think it would have made more sense to use a crawl to explain what happened, who is Rey, etc.
  5. Lastly, this is more of a nitpick criticism, but I personally think that naming Rey “Jaina” was pretty useless. It would have made more sense if her name was Rey and only Rey.

I hope you didn’t get offended by my criticisms, I’m only trying to be honest.

Post
#1569717
Topic
Unusual <strong>Sequel Trilogy</strong> Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

I was thinking about the possibility of reconciling Palpatine’s resurrection with the Chosen One Prophecy.

What if Palpatine from The Rise of Skywalker is not the real Palpatine? Maybe he’s just a med clone who inherited Palpatine’s memory and who believes to be Palpatine. Maybe we can say that Palpatine actually created a clone of himself in order to transfer his Force essence, but he never discovered how to transfer his spirit. Yet, the clone still exists and gained a separated conscience.

This way, we can actually say that Anakin killed Palpatine, yet still have Palpatine in The Rise of Skywalker.

Post
#1568212
Topic
Unpopular Opinion Thread
Time

of_Kaiburr_and_Whills said:

To chime in again, I can understand the argument that the Jedi can be both correct about Anakin and the Force while being simultaneously flawed in their methods.

But for me, one of the big issues is that because of their flaws, whether perceived or legitimate, some people will say that the purge was justified and that the Jedi deserved it. (With an attitude not of sorrow or pity or even disappointment, but more like contempt.)

Mind you, I’m not talking about the idea that their mistakes could have created a domino effect that lead to their own demise - but rather the notion that they actually deserved to die such gruesome deaths, that it meant as a good thing to be celebrated, and that Lucas intended this idea.

Now, do we have the Jedi reform to overcome these flaws? Fair enough. I understand. But executed and mass murdered? Huh? I can’t agree with that.

Now with all that being said, I wouldn’t say the ‘Jedi deserved to die’ camp in particular is strong enough to make this take an unpopular opinion. This is just where my mind went and it’s probably not where anyone was going with this discussion though. I just thought it would be worth it to address.

I don’t think that the Jedi deserved the Purge. But I believe that they needed to be reformed, because I am of the opinion that some of their dogmas were wrong. As I said in another post, I think that the Jedi were good people with good intentions, and I believe that Anakin had serious psychological problems that needed to be fixed. However, I also believe that he can’t be 100% blamed for what happened, and I think that the Jedi made some mistakes with him. Therefore, I think that the downfall of the Jedi was kind of everyone’s fault. It was equally fault of Anakin, Palpatine, and the Jedi themselves. The same goes for Anakin’s fall to the Dark Side. In my opinion, it is way too simplistic to believe that the Jedi did nothing wrong and it was all Anakin and Palpatine’s fault, just as it is way too simplistic to believe that Anakin did nothing wrong and it was all fault of the Jedi Order.

Post
#1567902
Topic
Strong Female characters in the Star Wars universe
Time

SparkySywer said:

I don’t like Padme. She loses the will to live because her heart got broken, despite having just given birth to two newborn children. Is being there for her vulnerable infants not enough to give her the will to live? Fuck them kids?

We could start a discussion about her death, but I personally am of the opinion that it would be a perfect waste of time. You don’t like it, while I’m able to rationalize it. Both opinions are fair. What I want to specify, though, is that there are plenty of Padmé fans who don’t like her death, and even say that it openly contradicts the essence of her character. Just like there are a ton of Mara Jade fans who don’t like the way they killed her off in Legacy of the Force, there are also a lot of Padmé fans who don’t like the way she died. So, liking a certain character doesn’t mean that you have to like the way that character died, because a character is way more than his/her death.

Post
#1566695
Topic
Unpopular Opinion Thread
Time

fmalover said:

Spartacus01 said:

What I’m about to say might sound like a joke, but I’m serious.

If they will ever make an official “What if” animated episode (or movie) where Anakin doesn’t fall to the Dark Side and manages to live a happy life with Padmé, THAT will become the Canon version in my head. I will ignore Revenge of the Sith and subsequent works forever. Period.

I don’t know if this is an unpopular opinion though…

You’re proposing a scenario in which Anakin goes through with Padme’s proposal of running off to live a quiet life away from all the Galaxy’s conflicts raising a family.

Yes, a scenario where Anakin discovers and kills Darth Sidious before his nightmares and Order 66, and then leaves the Order after the Clone Wars to stay with Padmé on Naboo.

Post
#1566662
Topic
Unpopular Opinion Thread
Time

What I’m about to say might sound like a joke, but I’m serious.

If they will ever make an official “What if” animated episode (or movie) where Anakin doesn’t fall to the Dark Side and manages to live a happy life with Padmé, THAT will become the Canon version in my head. I will ignore Revenge of the Sith and subsequent works forever. Period.

I don’t know if this is an unpopular opinion, though…

Post
#1566160
Topic
What is your personal Star Trek canon?
Time

BedeHistory731 said:

Why would you exclude The Motion Picture and Undiscovered Country?

Because I find them to be boring, honestly. And I know that “boring” doesn’t automatically mean bad, but I never felt the need to take those two movies as an actual part of the story.

Edit: This comment is not valid anymore. Now I accept both movies.

Post
#1566149
Topic
Should Dave Filoni Run The Creative Team at LucasFilm
Time

Every single show where Filoni had some involvement was mediocre at best, and totally bad at worst (except for the first season of The Mandalorian, which I genuinely liked). The Clone Wars undermines the Prequels, Rebels undermines the Original Trilogy, Tales of the Jedi was pure fan service, and I didn’t even bother to watch any other of the animated shows. In my opinion, the best content from Disney Star Wars is precisely the one Filoni is not involved with.

I still laugh every time a TCW fan tries to defend the show and Filoni. “Oh yes, TCW is the best piece of Star Wars since the Original Trilogy. Though, the first two seasons are totally bad, and even though the rest of the show is better than the first two seasons, there are still a lot of bad and skipable arcs. But guaranteed, the seventh season is a masterpiece, except 3/4 of it.”

Post
#1565726
Topic
Star Wars Headcanons
Time

From what I understand, the Force is not always passed through the blood. Yes, a person who is strong in the Force is more likely to have children who are strong in the Force, but that’s not a hard and fast rule. It can also happen that a person who is not strong in the Force gives birth to a person who has a large amount of midi-chlorians. This is true in both Canon and Legends.

Post
#1565532
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

Vladius said:

Layer 4 - I have very specific ideas about what people think about the movies’ history. I was there. They were disliked and considered disappointing. People hated Jar Jar. People hated young Anakin. People hated Anakin/Padme. People thought everything with Jango Fett was pandering. Younger millennials and some zoomers who weren’t even alive at the time try to pull revisionism over this and say that it was a small minority of hater fans and everyone else loved it, but this is absolutely not the case. It’s strange but this is the only site where you can still get honest opinions about this. The movies are not popular now because they’re good, even if you believe they are good. They’re popular due to a mix of nostalgia, memes, and expanded media projects like video games. A lot of this was successful astroturfing. The biggest thing is The Clone Wars show, which isn’t even that good, that “fixes the prequels.” The same people who tell you that they’re great movies that hold up will also tell you to watch eight seasons of animated shows and read extra books and comics to get the whole story.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to attack you or anything. But I think that you are being guilty of the same extremism you are criticizing. You said: “You can look at them as pieces of pop entertainment or as serious films or both, but you don’t have to go to extremes either way”, which is totally correct. But then, when it comes to the history of the movies and their appreciation by the fandom, you did the same thing you are preaching against: generalizing. Sure, I’m one of those millennials who were not around at the time, I became a Star Wars fan in 2018. But I don’t think that saying that everyone hated the movies is fair. I think that it is more fair to say that the fanbase felt very divided about them. I have known a lot of people who liked them from the beginning, just as I have known a lot of people who disliked them from the beginning. There were a lot of fans who liked the Prequels in the 2000s, just as there were a lot of fans who hated them in the same time period. Saying that everyone hated the movies is unfair to the people who always liked them. And they exist, denying their existence is unfair too. Furthermore, I have known a lot of people who became fans of the Saga only in recent years, watched the Prequels as adults, and liked them a lot. I’m one of them. So, to say that they became popular in recent years only because of nostalgia and the memes is a bit unfair too. I liked them when I first watched them. And I was already 18 when I watched them, so I didn’t have any nostalgia for them.

Post
#1565502
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

If not for Anakin being a greedy dumbass, i’d blame his fall completely on the prequel Jedi. They did everything they could to make him bottle up his feelings and be afraid of them, separate him from his only family and teach him that human bonds of compassion and affection were abnormal.

The Jedi were like a weird cult.

Had he been freed as a slave on Tatooine, he either would have been a pilot on a freighter making grain or water shipments, or a moisture farmer if not conscripted into the Imperial Navy. And probably not become Darth Vader, though its hard to say.

At the end of the day, I think that Anakin’s fall can’t be entirely blamed on the Jedi, but it can’t be entirely blamed on Anakin either. I think that Anakin, Palpatine and the Jedi are all equally responsible for what happened. Trying to blame only one of them is too simplistic, in my opinion.

On the one hand, what happened is obviously Anakin’s fault, because he acted selfishly and recklessly. Nobody forced him to do what he did. He chose to do all those terrible things, despite knowing that they were wrong. So, of course he is to blame for what happened. On the other hand, though, I think that it is also fault of the Jedi Order. Yes, their teachings about letting go are fundamentally correct. You can love a person, but you can’t possess that person, it is unhealthy to think that you can be in control of everything. All of this is correct, of course. But, forbidding romantic relationships was a mistake, because having a romantic relationship doesn’t automatically mean being overly-attached to someone. You can be in love with a person without being obsessive, and you can be able to handle your emotions properly. The Jedi took the “no attachment” rule too literally. They tried to help Anakin, they were fundamentally good people. But they had a limited understanding of romantic relationships, precisely because they didn’t allow them. They were so blinded by their dogma, that they didn’t realize that Anakin was not like the other younglings, he needed more than traditional Jedi teachings. And I’m more than sure that, if the Jedi didn’t forbid romantic relationships, they could have taught Anakin how to handle his relationship with Padmé in a healthy way from the very beginning, thus preventing what happened. And well, of course it’s also Palpatine’s fault, because he manipulated Anakin for a whole decade, making him become a very proudful person, making him think he should always be in control of everything, and thus making him want to have more and more power.

So, I think that what happened is kind of everyone’s fault. As I said, I think that trying to blame only a single person (or a single group of people) is too simplistic.

Post
#1565459
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

I don’t think it’s a good idea. The car chase sequence is one of the few scenes where we can see Obi-Wan and Anakin acting like friends, it is a scene where we can see them teasing each other in a friendly way, instead of always having a rocky relationship. Unlike many people on the forum, I generally don’t have a problem with them having a rocky relationship, but removing one of the scenes where they act friendly towards each other is not a good idea. After all, you need a reminder that they are still friends, even though they have a rocky relationship sometimes. So, I personally don’t like the idea. Removing that scene could improve the pacing, but would not improve Anakin and Obi-Wan’s friendship. And the training dual from Kenobi is not enough to show their friendship, in my opinion.

Post
#1565205
Topic
What do you HATE about the EU?
Time

I mean, I can understand the complaints of some people. I, too, would have preferred the Darth title to be introduced with Darth Bane. The appearance of the Sith as we know them from the Prequels, with Darth titles and red lightsabers, should have been introduced by Darth Bane, and should have died with Sidious in Return of the Jedi. But, at the same time, I can also live with it. Again, I, too, would have preferred if those things were introduced by Darth Bane himself, but I can live with it. So, I don’t understand why it is so much of an issue for other people on the forum.

Post
#1564970
Topic
What do you HATE about the EU?
Time

Vladius said:

Spartacus01 said:

Vladius said:

You can probably glean this from all my other posts across the site, but the most damaging parts of the prequel/EU/Filoni system involve the portrayal of the Jedi, dark Jedi, Sith, the Force, and the dark side.
“Gray Jedi”, “balance in the Force”, “using both sides of the Force”, “J’edaii” or whatever they’re called (also “Jensaarai” lol) the “light side” and “dark side” being equal and neither good or evil, Mortis BS, etc.

There’s exactly one YouTube channel (Geetsly’s) I’ve found that has a correct perspective on all of this, and every video that talks about it is swamped with the most cringey fanfic-tier comments about how both sides are wrong and UMM ACTUALLY THE JJ’EEDAIII (whose name those stupid Jedi freaks STOLE) WERE PERFECTLY BALANCED and if you went too far to one side they would banish you to the opposite moon until you got BALANCED again. Revan and Anakin and my OC Darklight Lightdarker can use the LightDark DarkLight GrayDark GrayLight LightLight DarkDark Side with no ill effects because they’re emotionally BALANCED.

This started with the prequels but EU writers and Dave Filoni made it much worse by making it canon depending on the story.

I think that you have the wrong perception of how the EU depicted the Light Side and the Dark Side of the Force. So, I would like to make some corrections.

In the EU, the word “Grey Jedi” was not used to describe Force users who use both sides of the Force at the same time. On the contrary, it was used to describe those members of the Jedi Order who, despite not using the Dark Side, at the same time don’t always followed the rules, and don’t always listened to the will of the Council. The word was used to describe the more rebellious members of the Jedi Order, and was never associated with the Dark Side of the Force. Never. And, it’s not like the word was often used, anyway. In fact, it was only used a couple of times through the entire EU. Furthermore, even though the Je’daii Order existed, and even though they tried to create a literal balance between the Light Side and the Dark Side, it was strongly implied that their ways were wrong, precisely because you can’t balance the Dark Side with the Light Side. In fact, the Je’daii Order fell apart.

When the EU was still Cannon, the Light Side was always considered as the true balance and the true natural state of the Force, and it was always explained that the Dark Side corrupts everything. Yes, some attitudes of the Jedi Order (and some individual Jedi) were criticized, especially during the Prequel era, but the Light Side in itself was never criticized, and being overly-attached was always seen as something negative that could lead to the Dark Side, even in Luke’s Jedi Order. Hell, in the Darth Plagueis novel, it was literally explained that Anakin was created by the Force as an automatic reaction, in order to stop the Sith from corrupting the Force itself. So, it was always implied that the Sith should be destroyed, because they corrupt the Force and create unnatural stuff, indeed.

It’s the New Canon the one that introduced the concept of “equal balance between the Light Side and the Dark Side”, not the EU. The EU always depicted the Dark Side as a cancer, and in all the stories that featured Force users who tried to balance the two sides, it was always implied that they were wrong. The problem is, though, that a lot of people on the internet don’t understand this, because they don’t actually experience the EU first hand. They just learn stuff from other people telling them, and from YouTubers who understand nothing about the EU themselves. And, because of this, we have people using the word “Grey Jedi” in the wrong way, and who unironically think that the Je’daii Order was correct, when they never managed to maintain the balance they wanted to maintain, precisely because such balance doesn’t exist.

Finally, this has nothing to do with the EU, but I wanted to point it out anyway. The Mortis arc in The Clone Wars was created by Lucas, not Filoni.

Edit: When I talk about the EU, I’m not including TCW into it. Yes, the first 6 seasons of the show are technically part of both Legends and Canon, but I prefer not to include TCW into the Legends timeline when discussing it. I see the show as being part of Disney’s New Canon only. The EU version of the Clone Wars is the one that was depicted in the Clone Wars Multimedia Project, while the Canon version is the one that was depicted in TCW. I prefer to maintain them as separate.

Yes, I know all of this. You’re preaching to the choir here. Unfortunately, in KOTOR they made Jolee Bindo a Gray Jedi in both senses, where he disagrees with the council because they’re prequel Jedi, but he’s also in the middle of the alignment spectrum and he has gray smoke behind him instead of blue or red. Even though he’s fully a good guy. They also added this second concept in a sourcebook for the Saga Edition RPG, the Jedi Academy Training Manual, which is a much-hated book for other reasons. Like I said, a lot of this comes from video games and got distributed throughout other things.

It doesn’t really matter where Mortis is from. If it was Lucas, then shame on Lucas. It’s the ultimate data point in creating confusion about Light Side/Dark Side = Yin/Yang and Anakin needing to be half good/half evil.

Well, like you said, he’s a good guy. Anyway, I wasn’t trying to defend Mortis. I just wanted to point out that it wasn’t Filoni’s idea. In general, I think that Filoni takes more credit for TCW than what he should. A lot of the contradictions TCW created with the Multimedia Project and the Prequels, as well as the more controversial mystical elements of the Force, were all Lucas’ ideas.

Post
#1564957
Topic
What do you HATE about the EU?
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

I mean i’m glad the Old EU Aka Legends has been left alone they haven’t gone back and given darth names to all the non Darth Sith Lords, or retroactively gave them all red lightsabers. And they didn’t edit the timeline or backstory Zahn had in his trilogy about the old Empire, the Clone Wars, they didn’t correct the ideas of the Jedi pre prequel to homogenize them with Lucas.

I mean, I don’t think they had any intention to do so, regardless. When they started writing the New Jedi Orders series, Lucas himself approved the idea of the Jedi being married, so they never felt the need to correct this. At best, they tried to insert Prequel references in the later novels, like the Legacy of the Force series and the Dark Nest Trilogy, but nothing more. And even when it comes to the Sith, I don’t think they had any intention of giving every Sith a Darth title and a red lightsaber. If I remember correctly, it was explained that these things were introduced by Darth Revan, so there was no need to retroactively modify the Sith from the Tales of the Jedi comics. And Lucas himself never wanted all Dark Side users to be Sith. He was the one who introduced Ventress in both TCW and the og Clone Wars, and she is not a Sith. As for the inaccuracies about the Clone Wars and the rise of the Empire in the Thrawn Trilogy, they tried to explain them in later novels, and used the Clone Wars Multimedia Project to portray events described in the Thrawn Trilogy, like the devastation of Honoghr during the Clone Wars.

Post
#1564954
Topic
What do you HATE about the EU?
Time

of_Kaiburr_and_Whills said:

Spartacus01 said:

Thanks for the clarification. It would seem certain YouTubers have done a great deal of damage to the fandom haven’t they?

Yes. But fortunately, in recent years, an ever-increasing number of YouTubers have been emerging, who focus exclusively on Legends content, explaining it in detail and helping to dispel many myths about the EU. One of these YouTubers is called Manda-LORE. I recommend his channel.