So people are making a fuss over a video game protagonist being female? Really?
Maybe the best ever Jedi is the one that doesn’t want that stuff. I can see Filoni taking that angle with his precious.
Typical Filoni.
Avatar: The Way of Water.
Didn’t care about what was happening until the 49 min mark. From there until the 2 hr 15 min I really loved it, but once the final battle begins I went back to not caring about the movie.
So basically I loved about one hour and twenty minutes of the movie. Honestly if it had just been 3 hours of Pandora’s marine life it would have been perfect, as I’m a sucker for marine life.
Kotor I is a classic. Sadly Kotor II I never could get past the first world.
The first world is a chore, no doubt about that. But the rest of the game is totally worth it. Be sure to install TSLRCM and give the game a second chance, you won’t regret it.
Is the app version smoother? I had a glitch where I could not complete the main story quest.
Don’t know. I’ve only ever played it on PC.
Kotor I is a classic. Sadly Kotor II I never could get past the first world.
The first world is a chore, no doubt about that. But the rest of the game is totally worth it. Be sure to install TSLRCM and give the game a second chance, you won’t regret it.
Even with the shoehorned “Chosen One” shenaningans in the prequels, Anakin’s mother was established as an uninportant slave with no Force sensitivity whatsoever.
I very much loved it when in TLJ Rey’s parentage is stated to be inconsequential.
Why the fuck did Rey have to be the long lost descendant of a previously established character? Why can’t she simply be Rey Nobody from Nowhere?
“Good” by Better Than Ezra. Perhaps the most joyful break-up song ever.
Just finished watching Ferris Bueller’s Day Off for the first time ever.
I guess the reason the movie is so fondly remembered is because it was a product of its time. I personally found it worth watching if only to pass the time, and I did chuckle quite a few times. I subscribe to the theory that Ferris is actually a figment of Cameron’s imagination and that Sloane represents a girl Cameron has a crush on but has never worked up the courage to talk to. Another reason is that they do a lot of stuff in Chicago that is simply impossible within the space of a few hours. If you take a good look at the movie Cameron is the real main character of the story.
Damn, I really felt sorry for Cameron. It’s pretty obvious he’s been neglected by his parents, and all scenes where he’s the main focus are pretty damn depressing.
Given his criminal charges Jeffrey Jones’ character Ed Rooney feels pretty off-putting.
This article IMO perfectly encapsulates the problems with the Sequel Trilogy.
I’m still here wishing that we’d gotten the complete misunderstanding that was Jodorowsky’s Dune. As insulting an adaptation as it would have been, it still would’ve made for a fascinatingly strange experience.
It would have most certainly been a beautiful mess of a movie, but I disagree with Jodorowsky’s plan to make it 14 hours long.
Ray Stevenson excelled at playing rugged tough guys.
The amazing thing is i bet your Bring it On trailer is better than the actual film on blu-ray which is quite lackluster.
Home Video versions will almost always be lackluster for movies shot and colour-timed on film because these companies use the Interpositive (IP) or the negative (O-neg), which have better resolution, but don’t have the grain or richness of photochemical colours that you see on 35mm film prints. O-neg or IPs look much smoother and not as crisper or textured as film prints. This is because prints used to go through a 4-step processing to become cinema release prints. With every step, the processing made the images denser/thicker and grains became more prominent, or so I heard. It is this grain that adds to the textured look of projected prints, which home videos obtained from O-neg or IPs lack.
take a look at the Jurassic Park 35mm scan. Why does it look far more richer than the 4K UHD. This is because the prints are four generations removed from the O-neg, while the UHD is a direct scan of the O-Neg. The result is the print looks crisper and textured while the UHD looks less defined. It doesn’t help that home video companies then apply an additional layer of denoising to water down whatever textures were left; resulting in a mushy, flattened look. Plus, cinema prints have richer and deeper colours because they use actual colour dyes. Digital colour does not look or feel as deep or thick, no matter the processing. Steve Yedlin came close to achieving print-level colours on The last jedi and Knives Out, but the images still looked recognisably digital.
Speaking of digital vs film, one noticeable difference between film prints and Digital Cinema Packages (DCPs) is that 35mm prints have an inherent soft, soothing image, while digital prints look sharp and harsher to the eyes, comparatively. I spoke to a cinema manager and he confirmed my observations.
Not to mention that 35mm prints have this organic look that makes the movie feel alive.
I for one don’t mind the generational loss that results from creating a film print, because another bonus is that visual effects, whether traditional optical effects or CGI, blend a lot better with the live action elements of the image as a result.
Am I glad George sold Lucasfilm to Disney? Well he sold out his own “independent” and “anti-film corp” way of doing things with that decision. Though from the Charlie Rose “White Slavers” interview he didn’t seem to have a high opinion of them. Plus, Disney’s history on this seems to be “profit over risk, rinse and repeat”
At least we didn’t get to see George retcon his own stories further with his latest vision for the Sequel films that would have made Leia as being “The Chosen One” instead of Anakin. Instead we get Favreau and Filoni retconning the EU instead.
So, I am glad he sold up, just not to Disney.
I’m more or less with this. Realistically, I’d have preferred to have seen George sell to a more independent company, with a background in taking risks with their projects. As fmalover posted above, companies with more creative freedom.
Ideally, it would have been great to see how Lucasfilm would have done as a worker owned co-op. With Lucasfilm not having to answer, or compromise with, anyone else.
What you’re suggesting is pretty much what Francis Ford Coppola was trying to do with American Zoetrope.
Personally I think George should have sold Lucasfilm either to Universal or Warner Bros. Based on my observations there seems to be a lot more creative freedom on those studios, and my biggest problem with Disney Star Wars is that Disney’s iron grip on the creative decisions is very palpable.
Plotwise TPM is pure nonsense, but doesn’t detract from it being a pretty damn fun movie to watch.
Seriously, I don’t get why everyone is so dismissive of The Lost World: Jurassic Park. It’s my personal favourite.
I could write a whole novel explaining everything that’s wrong with it, but that would turn this into the popular opinions thread.
Feel free to DM me, then.
Seriously, I don’t get why everyone is so dismissive of The Lost World: Jurassic Park. It’s my personal favourite.
it just often feels a bit sterile because the world isn’t fleshed out enough.
You’ve just described every Denis Villeneuve movie.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park is my personal favourite and I still don’t understand to this very day why it has so many detractors.
Maria Viktorovna
She kinda looks like Amy Adams.
The film Guardians of the Galaxy 3 is a fantastic ending to a heart warming trilogy. It’s a must see and a masterpiece. Thanks James Gunn for all the fun and heart.
I saw the first two GOTG movies and neither did anything for me, so I don’t feel any desire to watch this one.
I despise them.
The reviews?
Villeneuve’s version was like “look how badass she is”.
Unless you wanted Kynes to realise the folly of humans trying to control the environment while addressing the audience in a long monologue, or to have a couple minutes of the godawful voiceover narration that plagues the 1984 film, I really don’t see how Kynes’ book death would have worked on film. I also don’t see why it makes a different whether Kynes is a man or a woman.
Dune part one simply doesn’t have the runtime to delve in depth into Kynes’ dream of a terraformed Arrakis, it only touches on it, meaning a conclusion to movie Kynes’ story where she accepts humans cannot control nature would not have been narratively justified or satisfying. Villeneuve’s version deals with the aspect of Kynes which IS a big staple of her character in the film, her commitment to the Emperor and seeming refusal to pick a side. In her last moments she denounces the Emperor and embraces the Fremen part of herself entirely, which makes far more sense for this version. And yes it is the one of the most badass ways to go out. That’s no bad thing in my eyes.
I’ve posted countless times before that I thoroughly hate every single aspect of gender-swapped Kynes and nothing will change my mind on it.
I do have an idea for Kynes’s book death adapted to screen. Have it be this very surreal, trippy, dreamlike sequence.
Mike Stoklasa’s transition to a more professional review format is the reason I believe a Plinkett review of TROS will never happen. Besides RLM has thrived since they started branching out.
